True decentralization

At Litheum’s core is True Decentralization

Before it is possible to solve the scalability problem, it is critical to understand the origin of the dilemma. Blockchains in the past have been intentionally limited. This limitation is not a typical technical bottleneck, it is intentionally added for reasons related to the economics and risk.

Proof of Performance is pioneering the concept of True Decentralization. This critical concept contains the first principles of consensus design, the fundamental understanding of how Decentralization works. The revolutionary approach not only solves the scaling problem but offers the most secure possible blockchain.

Learn more

What is true decentralization?

True Decentralization is a critical concept to understand about blockchains and decentralized technology in general. It’s all about getting the blockchain to fully pay for itself, not just make blocks.

Ultimately, in a Truly Decentralized context, the most trusted and most used blockchain is the most secure. By leveraging a peer-to-peer method of collaterization, blockchains multiply their security by the number of people that trust the chain with their liquidity and use the chain to transact. However, this security is ultimately limited on other chains which can only focus on storage, but which cannot deliver a high volume of transactions. By getting past this hurdle, Litheum is capable of supporting a single high-value chain of blocks. Also, because Litheum does not rely on sharding, all fees and liqudity are concentrated on a single, dense chain, which is the most secure possible.

A Truly Decentralized blockchain or application must incentivize 100% of its functionality with its consensus game.

True Decentralization leads to an ultra secure blockchain

By ensuring that a blockchain is 100% incentivized, we can safely allow blocks to grow with demand. As people use the chain more and more, this generates more fees which are in-turn given to the Runners who in-turn deploy more infrastructure that makes the network both more secure and more performant.

The Litheum Difference

PoW
pos/dpos
sharding
POP
block production
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
51% security
51% of hash
51% of tokens
51% of hash/tokens
51% of fees
dos protection
No
No
?
YES
sybil attack security
off chain
off chain
?
ON chain
data redundancy
only transactions
only transactions
sharded
full
network robustness
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
true decentralization
scalable block size
fully decentralized
green
PoW
pos/dpos
sharding
POP
blcok production
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
51% security
51% of hash
51% of tokens
51% of hash/tokens
51% of fees
dos protection
No
No
?
YES
sybil attack security
off chain
off chain
?
ON chain
data redundancy
only transactions
only transactions
sharded
full
network robustness
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
true decentralization
scalable block size
fully decentralized
green
block production
PoW
decentralized
pos/dpos
decentralized
sharding
decentralized
POP
decentralized
PoW
pos/dpos
sharding
POP
blcok production
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
51% security
51% of hash
51% of tokens
51% of hash/tokens
51% of fees
dos protection
No
No
?
YES
sybil attack security
off chain
off chain
?
ON chain
data redundancy
only transactions
only transactions
sharded
full
network robustness
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
true decentralization
scalable block size
fully decentralized
green
51% security
PoW
51% of hash
pos/dpos
51% of tokens
sharding
51% of hash/tokens
POP
51% of fees
PoW
pos/dpos
sharding
POP
blcok production
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
51% security
51% of hash
51% of tokens
51% of hash/tokens
51% of fees
dos protection
No
No
?
YES
sybil attack security
off chain
off chain
?
ON chain
data redundancy
only transactions
only transactions
sharded
full
network robustness
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
true decentralization
scalable block size
fully decentralized
green
dos protection
PoW
no
pos/dpos
no
sharding
no
POP
yes
PoW
pos/dpos
sharding
POP
blcok production
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
51% security
51% of hash
51% of tokens
51% of hash/tokens
51% of fees
dos protection
No
No
?
YES
sybil attack security
off chain
off chain
?
ON chain
data redundancy
only transactions
only transactions
sharded
full
network robustness
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
true decentralization
scalable block size
fully decentralized
green
sybil attack security
PoW
off chain
pos/dpos
off chain
sharding
?
POP
on chain
PoW
pos/dpos
sharding
POP
blcok production
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
51% security
51% of hash
51% of tokens
51% of hash/tokens
51% of fees
dos protection
No
No
?
YES
sybil attack security
off chain
off chain
?
ON chain
data redundancy
only transactions
only transactions
sharded
full
network robustness
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
true decentralization
scalable block size
fully decentralized
green
data redundancy
PoW
only transactions
pos/dpos
only transactions
sharding
sharded
POP
Full
PoW
pos/dpos
sharding
POP
blcok production
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
51% security
51% of hash
51% of tokens
51% of hash/tokens
51% of fees
dos protection
No
No
?
YES
sybil attack security
off chain
off chain
?
ON chain
data redundancy
only transactions
only transactions
sharded
full
network robustness
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
true decentralization
scalable block size
fully decentralized
green
network robustness
PoW
no rpc decentralization
pos/dpos
no rpc decentralization
sharding
no rpc decentralization
POP
true decentralization
PoW
pos/dpos
sharding
POP
blcok production
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
51% security
51% of hash
51% of tokens
51% of hash/tokens
51% of fees
dos protection
No
No
?
YES
sybil attack security
off chain
off chain
?
ON chain
data redundancy
only transactions
only transactions
sharded
full
network robustness
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
true decentralization
scalable block size
fully decentralized
green
scalable block size
PoW
pos/dpos
sharding
POP
PoW
pos/dpos
sharding
POP
blcok production
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
51% security
51% of hash
51% of tokens
51% of hash/tokens
51% of fees
dos protection
No
No
?
YES
sybil attack security
off chain
off chain
?
ON chain
data redundancy
only transactions
only transactions
sharded
full
network robustness
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
true decentralization
scalable block size
fully decentralized
green
fully decentralized
PoW
pos/dpos
sharding
POP
PoW
pos/dpos
sharding
POP
blcok production
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
decentralized
51% security
51% of hash
51% of tokens
51% of hash/tokens
51% of fees
dos protection
No
No
?
YES
sybil attack security
off chain
off chain
?
ON chain
data redundancy
only transactions
only transactions
sharded
full
network robustness
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
no rpc decentralization
true decentralization
scalable block size
fully decentralized
green
green
PoW
pos/dpos
sharding
POP

Join Litheum's Testnet today

Builders Program
Discord
Telegram